No updates match this filter.
Timeline Expanded: GLXY, CIFR, WULF Added
New Coverage
The Timeline page now includes comprehensive coverage of GLXY, CIFR, and WULF alongside APLD. Timeline extends back to 2018 with Galaxy Digital's founding and traces each company through their public listings, infrastructure buildouts, and hyperscaler contracts.
Key Additions
- GLXY: 2018 founding, TSX listing, 2022 Helios acquisition, 2025 CoreWeave $15B contract, Nasdaq listing
- CIFR: 2021 SPAC merger, Texas operations, 2024 Barber Lake acquisition, 2025 Fluidstack and AWS deals totaling $9.3B
- WULF: 2021 founding and listing, Lake Mariner buildout, 2025 Fluidstack deals with Google backing totaling $16B+
Coming
Timeline coverage for RIOT, IREN, and NBIS in progress.
Timeline Preview Added
New Page
Added Timeline page showing corporate history and industry events in chronological order. The preview release covers APLD with other operators to follow.
Purpose
The thesis is dense. Some prefer reading it linearly. Others want to see how the pieces fit together chronologically. When did APLD pivot to HPC. Where does the CoreWeave contract fit in the broader narrative. The timeline serves the second group.
Coming
Full coverage of all seven operators and industry events. Each company requires cross-referencing press releases and news coverage to get dates and details right.
NVIDIA Deepens CoreWeave Investment
Development
NVIDIA invested an additional $2 billion in CoreWeave at $87.20 per share, becoming the company's second-largest shareholder. This follows their existing $3.3 billion stake and the $6.3 billion capacity backstop agreement through 2032 disclosed in September. Total NVIDIA exposure to CoreWeave now exceeds $11 billion.
Thesis Implications
CoreWeave is the primary counterparty for APLD ($11 billion in contracts) and GLXY ($15 billion+ projected). Counterparty risk was identified as a key bear case in Section 15. This investment materially changes that calculus. The relevant question shifts from "can CoreWeave pay?" to "can NVIDIA afford for CoreWeave to fail?" Jensen Huang's statement framed CoreWeave as "the foundation of the AI industrial revolution." That's dependency language, not investment language.
Metrics Page Added
New Page
Added Metrics page providing a fundamentals snapshot across all seven operators. Tracks cash, debt, revenue, contracted value, and enterprise value for quick comparative analysis.
EV/Contract Ratio
The page introduces EV/Contract as a key comparative metric. This ratio divides enterprise value by total contracted revenue to show how much the market is paying per dollar of committed future cash flows. A lower ratio suggests the market is discounting the contracts more heavily. A higher ratio suggests the market is pricing in execution confidence or expansion optionality. Comparing EV/Contract across operators reveals relative valuation disparities even when absolute contract sizes differ substantially.
Metrics Tracked
- Cash and debt positions
- Quarterly revenue (most recent reported)
- Contracted revenue totals
- Enterprise value and EV/Contract ratios
- Capacity metrics (live, contracted, pipeline)
Site Updates
- Resource cards added to landing page for Pipeline and Metrics
- Metrics accessible via direct link or from operators section
APLD Breaks Ground on Delta Forge 1
Development
Applied Digital broke ground on Delta Forge 1, a 430 MW AI Factory campus in a strategic southern U.S. market. The campus is designed to support up to 300 MW of critical IT load across two 150-MW facilities spanning more than 500 acres. Initial operations expected mid-2027, with ability to scale considerably in 2028 and beyond.
Thesis Implications
- APLD expansion pipeline now approaches 2 GW (600 MW contracted at Polaris Forge, 800 MW option, 430 MW Delta Forge 1)
- Company in discussions with another prospective investment-grade hyperscaler for Delta Forge 1, which would be a third major customer
- Demonstrates replicable AI Factory blueprint refined through Polaris Forge campuses
- Geographic diversification beyond North Dakota
Pipeline Page Added
New Page
Added Pipeline page tracking Bitcoin miners pivoting to AI infrastructure. These companies have power secured and infrastructure under development, but lack signed hyperscaler contracts. Not thesis positions until they close deals, but worth monitoring as the AI infrastructure buildout continues. A signed contract moves them to the main thesis.
Current Pipeline
- BITF (Bitfarms): 1.3 GW power pipeline, $750M liquidity. Panther Creek PA flagship site (350 MW) with Macquarie financing, T5 Data Centers as construction partner. Furthest along.
- HIVE (HIVE Digital): 540 MW total footprint across Sweden, Iceland, and Canada. Already generating GPU cloud revenue. Paraguay expansion underway.
- DGXX (Digi Power X): 197 MW available power in Texas ERCOT. Early stage, smallest of the three.
Site Updates
- Pipeline link added to landing page operators section
- Page accessible via direct link or from main thesis navigation
RIOT Position Initiated: AMD Lease + Rockdale Acquisition
Position Initiated
RIOT enters the thesis following the announcement of a 10-year Data Center Lease with AMD and fee simple acquisition of the Rockdale site. RIOT becomes the fifth core infrastructure operator alongside APLD, GLXY, CIFR, and WULF.
Contract Details
- 10-year AMD lease: 25 MW initial at Rockdale, ~$311 million base, ~$1 billion with extensions
- Expansion options to 200 MW total potential
- Phase 1 delivery January 2026, Phase 2 May 2026
Fee Simple Acquisition
- Acquired Rockdale outright for $96 million, funded by selling Bitcoin from the balance sheet
- 700 MW grid interconnection, dedicated water and fiber
- Ownership unlocks full data center development flexibility
Compensation Restructuring
- 2026 AIP amended to tie bonuses to data center execution
- New metrics: Data Center Revenue (15%), Data Center NOI (15%)
- "Bitcoin Yield" metric eliminated
- Incentives now fully aligned with AI infrastructure pivot
Thesis Significance
AMD as counterparty expands thesis beyond hyperscalers to chipmakers building inference capacity. RIOT's 1.7 GW Texas portfolio (Rockdale 700 MW + Corsicana 1 GW) positions them similarly to other core operators. Corsicana has reported hyperscaler interest (Microsoft, Amazon) but no signed contracts yet. Smallest contracted base in thesis currently, but first contract often precedes rapid accumulation.
Structure Changes
- Core operators: 4 → 5 (added RIOT as §12)
- Total operators: 6 → 7
- Total sections: 15 → 16
- IREN renumbered to §13, NBIS to §14
- Bear Cases renumbered to §15, Rebuttals to §16
Aggregate Figures Updated
- Core contracted revenue: $57B → $58B
- Total contracted revenue: $87B → $88B
- Combined market cap: $70-75B → $80-85B
GLXY ERCOT Approval: 1.6 GW Total Capacity
Capacity Update
GLXY announced ERCOT approval of an additional 830 MW at the Helios data center campus in West Texas. This doubles total ERCOT-approved, utility-contracted capacity to over 1.6 GW.
Key Details
- Total approved capacity now 1.6 GW (was 800 MW), via completed interconnection studies and a utility service agreement
- CoreWeave holds the original 800 MW; the new 830 MW is available for additional customers
- Ultimate buildout potential remains 3.5 GW
Thesis Implications
This approval validates the temporal moat thesis. Galaxy acquired Helios in December 2022 for $65M. Three years later, they've doubled their approved capacity through ERCOT's queue, a process new entrants would need 5+ years to replicate. The 830 MW represents expansion runway for additional hyperscaler relationships beyond CoreWeave.
APLD Revenue Analysis Page
New Content
Added dedicated APLD Revenue Analysis page with detailed breakdown of Q2 FY26 economics. The analysis reverse-engineers the per-MW run rate from partial-quarter data using actual energization dates (Phase I: Oct 27, Phase II: Nov 24).
Key Findings
- $12M lease revenue on ~23% utilization implies a ~$52M full-quarter run rate
- Implied rate of ~$2.08M per MW exceeds the contract range
- Stabilized 600 MW implies ~$1.25B annual HPC lease revenue
Site Updates
Link added to APLD section (§8) pointing to the new analysis. Page will be updated quarterly as new data becomes available.
APLD Q2 FY26 Earnings Update
Results
APLD reported Q2 FY26 results (quarter ended November 30, 2025). Revenue of $126.6 million, up 250% year over year. First HPC lease revenue recognized: $12 million from the 100 MW facility at Polaris Forge 1. Adjusted EBITDA of $20.2 million. Adjusted net income at breakeven.
Execution Milestones
- 100 MW facility delivered on schedule, fully energized
- 150 MW facility under construction, expected in 2026
- Polaris Forge 2 (200 MW) broke ground, full capacity early 2027
Balance Sheet
- Cash $2.3 billion against $2.6 billion total debt
- $2.35 billion senior secured notes closed
- Macquarie preferred equity: $900 million drawn of $5 billion
Forward Guidance
Management raised guidance, now expecting to exceed $1 billion NOI within five years. Company disclosed advanced discussions with a third investment-grade hyperscaler across multiple regions including additional Dakota sites and southern U.S. markets.
NBIS Addition & IREN Reframe
Position Initiated
NBIS (Nebius Group) added to the thesis as an adjacent position. Nebius operates the same GPU cloud model as IREN: own the hardware, sell compute. Two hyperscaler contracts totaling $20.4B:
- Microsoft: $17.4B over 5 years (option to $19.4B), Vineland NJ data center
- Meta: $3B over 5 years, deployed within 3 months of signing
Already generating revenue at scale, unlike most operators in the thesis. Power portfolio targeting 2.5 GW contracted by end of 2026.
NBIS is categorized as adjacent rather than core. Same rationale as IREN: GPU cloud sells FLOPs, not infrastructure. Hardware obsolescence exposure the colocation operators don't face. The contracts are real. The model is different.
Position Reframed
IREN moved from core thesis to adjacent position. The $9.7B Microsoft contract remains compelling. The 3 GW power portfolio is real. But IREN sells compute, not infrastructure. Buildings don't depreciate on NVIDIA's release cycle. GPUs do.
This isn't a downgrade. It's a categorization correction. The core thesis is "Follow the Watts": power as constraint, infrastructure as product. IREN monetizes power differently than APLD, GLXY, CIFR, and WULF. The adjacent category acknowledges this distinction.
Thesis Structure
Sections reorganized to reflect the core/adjacent distinction:
- Core Four: APLD (§8), GLXY (§9), CIFR (§10), WULF (§11). Colocation model.
- Adjacent Two: IREN (§12), NBIS (§13). GPU cloud model.
Total sections increased from 14 to 15. Part IV now covers six operators. Part V (Bear Cases, Rebuttals) renumbered accordingly.
Aggregate Figures Updated
- Total contracted revenue: $67B → $87B across six operators
- Combined market cap: $20-25B → $40-50B (including NBIS at ~$21B)
- Operator count references updated throughout (five → six)
Comparison Section Expanded
The pattern comparison in Section 11 (WULF) now includes both adjacent positions. Each dimension (contracted revenue, counterparty, expansion runway, execution status, business model, category error, hyperscaler validation) updated to reflect NBIS alongside IREN.
Sources Added
Seven sources for NBIS section:
- Nebius Microsoft $17.4B contract PR (Sep 2025)
- Nebius Microsoft contract SEC 6-K with $19.4B option terms
- Nebius Meta $3B contract PR (Nov 2025)
- Q3 2025 earnings release
- New Jersey 300MW data center announcement
- Finland 75MW expansion announcement
- Investor relations filings
Initial Publication
Thesis Launched
Follow the Watts published with five operators: APLD, GLXY, IREN, CIFR, WULF. Core argument: power scarcity creates infrastructure moats. Contracted revenue from hyperscalers and neoclouds provides visibility. Market mispricing due to crypto categorization creates opportunity.
14 sections across 5 parts. Approximately $67B in contracted revenue across operators at time of publication.